• Version 1.0
  • |
  • Last updated 25th March 2019

Spy Fever 1914

Spy Fever describes an anxiety or paranoia that enemy spies might be active within one’s own nation. The phenomenon was widespread in all theatres of World War I from at least August of 1914. Most of these reports were in fact false, but the sense of threat reinforced the image in increasingly nationalist societies of being besieged by the enemy from without as well as within.

General

In the early days of World War I, a period of nervous waiting, the nationalism and propaganda fostered by both state and society in all war theatres created a breeding ground for collective myths. Many of these myths sought to personalise the enemy, especially the figure of the enemy spy. This fear rested on the notion that spies were allegedly everywhere within the nation, and yet also undetectable – constituting a dangerous and duplicitous internal enemy. This created a situation whereby all citizens could contribute to the national war effort and thus the greater good by remaining vigilant and fighting this threat. However, while spies seemed to be ubiquitous in the public mind and media, there were in reality very few convictions for espionage. The following section will focus on Spy Fever as it played out in the war theatres of Great Britain, the German Reich, France, and Russia.

Spy Fever in Great Britain

Given its reputation as the home of spy fiction, British society was highly sensitized to the topic of espionage. Even before the war it was taken for granted that Germany had a highly developed espionage system, so when the war began the British public feverishly participated in the media hunt for German spies. Although none of the cases investigated turned out to be true, it took the British government nearly a month to deny multiple reports that the state had indeed found and executed spies. On the one hand, these anxieties must be understood against the background of a general invasion anxiety, as the German army was gaining ground quickly in Belgium and France. Yet on the other hand, a scapegoat was needed for the setbacks of the British army. This was found in members of the elite with an unknown origin or in artists seen as living a profligate life. But it was primarily the 50,000 people of German origin living in Britain who raised suspicion, leading to accusations of espionage, but also sabotage and food poisoning. Anti-German riots broke out in October 1914. The political right gave these images antisemitic connotations as well, so that “Germans, Jews and Spies became nearly synonyms”1.

Spy Fever in the German Reich

The German authorities also believed in a general threat posed by spies. In the German Reich, the fear of omnipresent spies was promoted by the government as a measure to strengthen readiness for defence. One of the most common reports included “gold cars,” cars full of gold that the French military were allegedly driving through Germany to Russia for the war effort. Vigilance committees were created, which threatened drivers and hung metal wires across roads at night which became deadly traps. After almost a dozen people died, the German government finally denied the existence of the “gold cars,” but even this did not end the hunt. Spy Fever in Germany also included reports of poisoned food and water, sabotage, or the intentional spreading of diseases. In some cases local governments were compelled to prove that spies had not poisoned local water supplies by drinking it in ostentatious public displays. In many municipalities police were overwhelmed by reports of enemy aircraft sightings, as part of the German population was gripped by, as the Kölnische Volkszeitung stated critically, a “great, nearly frantically agitation”2. The main perpetrators were understood to be foreigners. It is remarkable that in 1914 groups already commonly perceived as internal enemies, such as Jews or organised workers, were not accused of espionage. Spy fever, although initially encouraged by the government, in fact spiraled out of control and became a hindrance to public order and the war effort. As in other locales, there were very few convictions, suggesting this was mainly an imaginary danger.

Spy Fever in France

As France was Germany’s main target at the beginning of the war, the central threat was perceived as German spies sabotaging war mobilization and supply lines. Spy Fever was mainly present in the first months of the war, fueled by the press. German companies operating in France were popular targets, accused of distributing rotten goods and holding back materials of military importance. German spies were alleged to have organised sabotage on railways or informed nearby German troops using light signals. In the first weeks of the war a wave of arrests targeting foreigners occurred, but no one was found guilty of espionage in the trials that followed. A few German shops were looted in Paris, but it was not a mass phenomenon. In the second half of August 1914, a panic broke out within the French government when the fall of Paris and occupation by German troops seemed imminent. The government proved highly willing to believe that spies were to blame for this situation and developed plans for evacuation in the last days of August and beginning of September 1914. This mixture of military defeats, the fear of Paris being captured, and losing the war created a widespread willingness to believe conspiratorial explanations for these events.

Spy Fever in Russia

Fear of espionage played a crucial role in Russia even before the war started. Russia’s defeat in the Russo-Japanese War was a key factor here, as it was widely understood to have resulted from sophisticated Japanese espionage. Shortly prior to World War I a law was passed that removed the right to a trial for suspected spies. When the war began, a massive Spy Fever broke out, mainly linked to antisemitism. Jews were viewed as disloyal to the Russian nation and were accused of collaborating with the enemy. However, German-speaking citizens, freemasons, and various other ethnic minorities were also targets, especially during riots. While Russian authorities were mainly interested in preserving order, the army often radicalized the media-fueled hunt for spies. Given nearly unlimited power when the war broke out, the Russian army deported internal minorities in large numbers without any judicial process.

Conclusion

Until the turn of the century espionage was understood to be a purely military matter. By World War I this had changed in several important ways. National intelligence agencies were established, leading to the professionalization of espionage. Around the same time, several spectacular espionage cases captured the popular imagination. This greatly contributed to a broader public interest in espionage and popularised the genre of spy fiction. In this “age of nervousness” (Joachim Radkau), the enemy spy consolidated all the anxieties of nationalist societies in wartime. Since EigensinnAlf Lüdtke (1943-2019) concept, which is commonly rendered in English as “stubbornness” – as a consequence and tool of nationalist ideologies, such as Spy Fever, can never be underestimated, it is also important to consider the ways in which the fear of the “internal enemy” was instrumentalized by interest groups for domestic political purposes. This is especially true for Germany, France, and Great Britain, but also for other belligerent and neutral countries in which similar phenomena occurred.

Sebastian Bischoff, Universität Paderborn

Section Editor: Mark Jones
  1. Altenhöner, Florian: Kommunikation und Kontrolle. Gerüchte und städtische Öffentlichkeiten in Berlin und London 1914/1918. München 2008, p. 198.
  2. Kölnische Volkszeitung, 20. August 1914, No. 741.
Sebastian Bischoff: Spy Fever 1914, in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War, ed. by Ute Daniel, Peter Gatrell, Oliver Janz, Heather Jones, Jennifer Keene, Alan Kramer, and Bill Nasson, issued by Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin 2019-03-25. DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.11355
Note

Images7

“The populace in London has risen”, caricature
Spy propaganda, especially at the beginning of the conflict, was so misinformed that cartoonists later preferred to deride the exaggerated fears spies engendered in the population. Alfred Leete (1882-1933) created “Schmidt the Spy”, a ridiculous figure who misconstrues everything. Upon seeing women fighting each other during a sale, he reports to Berlin: “Revolution has broken out in London.”
Leete, Alfred: The populace in London has risen, in: Leete, Alfred: Schmidt the spy and his messages to Berlin, London 1916, p. 51; source: Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/schmidtspyhismes00leet; contributed by Eberhard Demm.
This file has been identified as Public Domain Mark 1.0: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/.

“Drastic measures for the defence of London are discovered”, caricature
Spy propaganda, especially at the beginning of the conflict, was so misinformed that cartoonists later preferred to deride the exaggerated fears spies engendered in the population. Alfred Leete (1882-1933) created “Schmidt the Spy”, a ridiculous figure who misconstrues everything.
Leete, Alfred: Drastic measures for the defence of London are discovered, in: Leete, Alfred: Schmidt the spy and his messages to Berlin, London 1916, p. 15; source: Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/schmidtspyhismes00leet; contributed by Eberhard Demm.
This file has been identified as Public Domain Mark 1.0: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/.

“Trahison”, caricature
Spy propaganda, especially at the beginning of the conflict, was so misinformed that cartoonists later preferred to deride the exaggerated fears spies engendered in the population. In a cartoon published in the French magazine La Baionnette, a wife says to her husband: “Can you imagine, our German nanny – that was General von Kluck!” He replies: “Shocking! Imagine that I deceived you with her!”
Iribe, Paul: Trahison, caricature, in: La Baionnette, 6 July 1916, p. 432; source: coll. La contemporaine (former BDIC); contributed by Eberhard Demm.
Courtesy of the coll. La contemporaine (formerly BDIC).

Don’t talk, Spies are listening
This anti-espionage poster warns U.S. citizens of German spies, depicting Wilhelm II, German Emperor, as a spider in a web.
Unknown author (Intelligence Officer Northeastern Dept. U.S. Army): Don’t talk. The web is spun for you with invisible threads, keep out of it, help to destroy it–spies are listening, lithograph, Walker Lith. & Pub. Co. Boston, USA, c. 1917; source: Boston Public Library, Print Department, File name: 07_01_000069, via flickr, https://www.flickr.com/photos/boston_public_library/3551356801/.
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/.

Poster warning of espionage, 1915
“Taisez-vous! Méfiez-vous! Les oreilles ennemies vous écoutent” (Keep quiet! Beware! Enemy ears are listening to you).
Unknown creator: Affiche : “Méfiez-vous : Taisez-vous”, lithograph, Paris, 1915; source: Gallica, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Meurisse 58609,
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b90441749/.
This image has been identified as public domain.

The Fleet in Peril, Inside the Lines, poster
The spy play “The Fleet in Peril, Inside the Lines” by Earl Derr Biggers was performed at the Apollo Theatre in London in 1914.
Unknown artist, 1914, London, Great Britain.
IWM (Art.IWM PST 5178), http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/28455.

Vorsicht bei Gesprächen! Spionengefahr!, poster
This German poster is warning against loud conversations, claiming spies may listen.
Unknown artist (P.O.E.): Vorsicht bei Gesprächen! Spionengefahr!, Germany, 1914/1918; source: Deutsches Historisches Museum, PK 2008/400, http://www.dhm.de/datenbank/dhm.php?seite=5&fld_0=ZD007541.
© DHM (PK 2008/400), Berlin.